Calculate \( \Lambda_m^0 \) for acetic acid and its degree of dissociation (\( \alpha \)) if its molar conductivity is 48.1 \( \Omega^{-1} \, \text{cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1} \).
Given that
\( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{HC}) = 426 \, \Omega^{-1} \, \text{cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1} \),
\( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{NaCl}) = 126 \, \Omega^{-1} \, \text{cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1} \),
\( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COONa}) = 91 \, \Omega^{-1} \, \text{cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1} \).
To solve the problem, we need to calculate the limiting molar conductivity (\( \Lambda_m^0 \)) of acetic acid and its degree of dissociation (\( \alpha \)), given its molar conductivity (\( \Lambda_m \)) as 48.1 \( \Omega^{-1} \, \text{cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1} \), and the limiting molar conductivities: \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{HCl}) = 426 \), \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{NaCl}) = 126 \), and \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COONa}) = 91 \, \Omega^{-1} \, \text{cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1} \).
1. Calculate \( \Lambda_m^0 \) for Acetic Acid:
Acetic acid (\( \text{CH}_3\text{COOH} \)) dissociates into \( \text{H}^+ \) and \( \text{CH}_3\text{COO}^- \). We use Kohlrausch’s law to find \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COOH}) \): \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COOH}) = \lambda_m^0 (\text{H}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COO}^-) \).
We can find these ionic conductivities using the given data:
- \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{HCl}) = \lambda_m^0 (\text{H}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{Cl}^-) = 426 \),
- \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{NaCl}) = \lambda_m^0 (\text{Na}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{Cl}^-) = 126 \),
- \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COONa}) = \lambda_m^0 (\text{Na}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COO}^-) = 91 \).
Subtract the second equation from the first to eliminate \( \lambda_m^0 (\text{Cl}^-) \):
\( \lambda_m^0 (\text{H}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{Cl}^-) - (\lambda_m^0 (\text{Na}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{Cl}^-)) = 426 - 126 \),
\( \lambda_m^0 (\text{H}^+) - \lambda_m^0 (\text{Na}^+) = 300 \).
Now use the third equation with \( \lambda_m^0 (\text{Na}^+) \):
From the third equation, \( \lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COO}^-) = 91 - \lambda_m^0 (\text{Na}^+) \).
We need \( \lambda_m^0 (\text{H}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COO}^-) \):
Add \( \lambda_m^0 (\text{H}^+) - \lambda_m^0 (\text{Na}^+) = 300 \) to \( \lambda_m^0 (\text{Na}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COO}^-) = 91 \):
\( \lambda_m^0 (\text{H}^+) + \lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COO}^-) = 300 + 91 = 391 \).
Thus, \( \Lambda_m^0 (\text{CH}_3\text{COOH}) = 391 \, \Omega^{-1} \, \text{cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1} \).
2. Calculate the Degree of Dissociation (\( \alpha \)):
The degree of dissociation is given by \( \alpha = \frac{\Lambda_m}{\Lambda_m^0} \):
\( \alpha = \frac{48.1}{391} \approx 0.123 \).
Final Answer:
The limiting molar conductivity \( \Lambda_m^0 \) for acetic acid is \( 391 \, \Omega^{-1} \, \text{cm}^2 \, \text{mol}^{-1} \), and the degree of dissociation \( \alpha \) is approximately \( 0.123 \).
Write IUPAC names of the following compounds and classify them into primary, secondary and tertiary amines.
(i) (CH3 )2CHNH2 (ii) CH3 (CH2 )2NH2 (iii) CH3NHCH(CH3 )2
(iv) (CH3 )3CNH2 (v) C6H5NHCH3 (vi) (CH3CH2 )2NCH3 (vii) m–BrC6H4NH2
Give one chemical test to distinguish between the following pairs of compounds.
(i) Methylamine and dimethylamine
(ii) Secondary and tertiary amines
(iii) Ethylamine and aniline
(iv) Aniline and benzylamine
(v) Aniline and N-methylaniline
Account for the following:
(i) pKb of aniline is more than that of methylamine.
(ii) Ethylamine is soluble in water whereas aniline is not.
(iii) Methylamine in water reacts with ferric chloride to precipitate hydrated ferric oxide.
(iv) Although amino group is o– and p– directing in aromatic electrophilic substitution reactions, aniline on nitration gives a substantial amount of m-nitroaniline.
(v) Aniline does not undergo Friedel-Crafts reaction.
(vi) Diazonium salts of aromatic amines are more stable than those of aliphatic amines. (vii) Gabriel phthalimide synthesis is preferred for synthesising primary amines.