Concept:
A reflecting telescope uses a large concave mirror as its objective, whereas a refracting telescope uses a convex lens as its objective. Reflecting telescopes are generally preferred for astronomical observations because mirrors overcome several limitations associated with large lenses.
Advantage 1: Absence of Chromatic Aberration
In a refracting telescope, the objective lens refracts different colours of light by different amounts because the refractive index of the lens material depends on wavelength.
As a result:
• Different colours focus at different points.
• Coloured fringes are produced around the image.
• Image quality deteriorates.
This defect is called chromatic aberration.
A reflecting telescope uses a mirror instead of a lens.
Since reflection is independent of wavelength,
\[
\text{Angle of Reflection} = \text{Angle of Incidence}
\]
for all colours.
Therefore, all colours are reflected and focused at the same point.
Hence, a reflecting telescope is completely free from chromatic aberration.
Advantage 2: Larger Aperture Can Be Constructed
The objective mirror of a reflecting telescope can be supported from the back.
Therefore:
• Very large mirrors can be manufactured.
• The mirror does not sag significantly under its own weight.
• Large apertures become practically possible.
In contrast, a lens can only be supported at its edges.
Large lenses become heavy and may deform under their own weight, limiting the maximum achievable aperture.
A larger aperture provides:
• Greater light-gathering power.
• Better resolving power.
• Brighter images of distant celestial objects.
Result:
Two important advantages of a reflecting telescope over a refracting telescope are:
• It is free from chromatic aberration.
• Large aperture mirrors can be constructed easily, giving greater light-gathering and resolving power.