Concept:
A reflecting telescope uses a concave mirror as the objective instead of a lens. Reflecting telescopes are preferred over refracting telescopes because mirrors have several practical advantages over lenses.
Reason 1: Absence of chromatic aberration.
A lens forms images by refraction and different colours of light suffer different amounts of refraction. Consequently, images formed by lenses suffer from chromatic aberration.
A mirror forms images by reflection, and the law of reflection is independent of the wavelength of light.
Therefore,
\[
\boxed{
\text{Reflecting telescopes are free from chromatic aberration.}
}
\]
Reason 2: Large aperture can be obtained easily.
In a refracting telescope, a large lens becomes very heavy and can be supported only at its edges, causing deformation and image defects.
On the other hand, a mirror can be supported from its back, making it possible to manufacture mirrors of very large diameter.
Therefore,
\[
\boxed{
\text{Reflecting telescopes can have very large apertures and hence greater light-gathering power.}
}
\]
Hence, a reflecting telescope is preferred because:
• It is free from chromatic aberration.
• Very large objective mirrors can be constructed, giving greater light-gathering and resolving power.