Step 1: Recall the formula for electrical resistivity.
From the classical free electron theory, resistivity is given by:
\[
\rho = \frac{m}{n e^2 \tau}
\]
where \( m \) is mass of electron, \( e \) is charge of electron, \( n \) is number of free electrons per unit volume, and \( \tau \) is relaxation time.
Step 2: Identify proportionality.
From the formula:
\[
\rho \propto \frac{1}{n\tau}
\]
So resistivity is inversely proportional to both \( n \) and \( \tau \).
Step 3: Analyze each given parameter.
- \( n \): appears in denominator → \( \rho \propto \frac{1}{n} \)
- \( \tau \): also in denominator → \( \rho \propto \frac{1}{\tau} \)
- \( A \): does not appear in resistivity expression
- \( T \): affects \( \tau \) indirectly but not directly in formula
Step 4: Eliminate incorrect options.
Resistivity is not directly proportional to \( n \), \( \tau \), or \( A \).
It is inversely proportional to \( n \) and \( \tau \).
Step 5: Choose the correct direct proportionality form.
Since
\[
\rho \propto \frac{1}{n}
\]
this matches one of the given options.
Step 6: Physical interpretation.
More free electrons (\( n \uparrow \)) means easier current flow → lower resistivity.
Thus resistivity decreases as \( n \) increases.
Step 7: Final conclusion.
Hence,
\[
\boxed{\rho \propto \frac{1}{n}}
\]
Therefore, the correct option is
\[
\boxed{(4)\ \dfrac{1}{n}}
\]