Yes, the primary objective of infrastructural development during British rule was to serve colonial interests rather than promote Indian economic growth.
Justifications:
1. Railway Development for British Trade:
- Railways were developed to facilitate the transportation of raw materials (like cotton and jute) from Indian hinterlands to British industries.
- Finished goods from Britain were transported back for sale in Indian markets, further exploiting the Indian economy.
2. Infrastructural Focus on British Gains:
- Roads, ports, and telegraphs were developed to ease British administrative control and military movement, not to boost Indian industries. 3. Neglect of Indigenous Industrial Growth:
- Despite infrastructural improvements, no substantial efforts were made to develop indigenous industries in India.
- Indian businesses remained stagnant and dependent on British imports.
Conclusion: Thus, while infrastructure development benefited India in the long run, its primary objective under British rule was to enhance colonial exploitation rather than national development.
___________ farming is a system that is helpful in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the ecological balance.
(Choose the correct alternative to fill in the blank):
The present day rapid industrial growth in China can be traced back to the economic reforms introduced in 1978, where ________ .
(Choose the correct alternative to fill in the blank):
(i) Initially reforms were initiated in agriculture, foreign trade and investment sectors.
(ii) The policy of dual pricing was adopted.
(iii) The Government revoked the policy of Special Economic Zones.
Read the following statements: Assertion (A) and Reason (R). Choose the correct alternative from those given below:
Assertion (A): In the recent past, Indian economy has been facing the problem of jobless growth.
Reason (R): Jobless growth refers to a situation where an economy is able to produce more goods and services without generating additional employment.
Read the following statements carefully:
Statement 1: India, Pakistan, and China have similar physical endowments but totally different political systems.
Statement 2: Both India and Pakistan laid great emphasis on creating a large private sector.
Read the following statements carefully:
Statement 1: India, Pakistan and China have similar physical endowments, but totally different political systems.
Statement 2: Both India and Pakistan laid great emphasis on creating a large private sector.