Instead of substituting directly into \( R = R_0 A^{1/3} \), this approach uses a ratio comparison against a convenient reference nucleus whose radius is easy to state, scaling from there.
Take a small reference nucleus with mass number \( A_{\text{ref}} = 1 \) (a single nucleon), whose "radius" by the same formula is just \( R_0 \approx 1.2\,\text{fm} \), the accepted empirical constant.
Since the nuclear radius scales with the cube root of the mass number, the radius of any other nucleus relates to this reference by:
\[ \frac{R}{R_{\text{ref}}} = \left(\frac{A}{A_{\text{ref}}}\right)^{1/3} = A^{1/3} \]For the nucleus in question, \( A = 125 \). Since \( 5 \times 5 \times 5 = 125 \), the cube root of 125 is exactly 5. So the radius scales up by a clean factor of 5 relative to the single-nucleon reference:
\[ R = 5 \times R_0 = 5 \times 1.2\,\text{fm} = 6.0\,\text{fm} \]This scaling approach reaches the same figure without needing to treat \( R = R_0 A^{1/3} \) as one combined substitution, it separates the constant \( R_0 \) from the scaling factor \( A^{1/3} \) so each part of the answer's origin is clear.
Therefore, the radius of the nucleus is 6.0 fm.