Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The electric field is the negative gradient of the potential. In two dimensions, \(E_x = -\dfrac{\partial V}{\partial x}\) and \(E_y = -\dfrac{\partial V}{\partial y}\).
The direction of the field is then found from the signs and sizes of \(E_x\) and \(E_y\).
Step 2: Differentiate the Potential:
Given \(V = 1.0x^2 - 2.0y^2\).
\[ E_x = -\frac{\partial V}{\partial x} = -2.0x \]
\[ E_y = -\frac{\partial V}{\partial y} = +4.0y \]
Step 3: Put in the Point (2.0 m, 1.0 m):
\[ E_x = -2.0 \times 2.0 = -4.0 \text{ V/m} \]
\[ E_y = 4.0 \times 1.0 = +4.0 \text{ V/m} \]
So the field points left (negative x) and up (positive y). Both components have equal size.
Step 4: Find the Angle:
\[ \tan\theta = \frac{E_y}{E_x} = \frac{4.0}{-4.0} = -1 \]
The reference angle is \(45^{\circ}\). The vector lies in the second quadrant (x negative, y positive).
So the angle with the positive x-axis is \(180^{\circ} - 45^{\circ} = 135^{\circ}\).
Step 5: Why the Other Options Are Wrong:
\(45^{\circ}\) needs both components positive, but \(E_x\) is negative. \(90^{\circ}\) needs \(E_x = 0\), but \(E_x = -4.0\). \(315^{\circ}\) needs \(E_x\) positive and \(E_y\) negative, which is the opposite of what we found.
Final Answer:
The field at the point makes \(135^{\circ}\) with the positive x-axis. This is option (C).
\[ \boxed{135^{\circ}} \]