Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks to provide evidence demonstrating that India's nuclear program is designed to protect its own national security (autonomy) while simultaneously supporting a world free of nuclear weapons.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
1. Refusal to Sign Discriminatory Treaties (Strategic Autonomy): India has consistently refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).
India argues these treaties are discriminatory, as they allow the P5 nations to keep their arsenals while preventing others from developing them. By staying out, India maintained its strategic autonomy to test and weaponize (as seen in Pokhran-II in 1998) to counter regional threats from China and Pakistan.
2. Credible Minimum Deterrence (Strategic Autonomy): India's policy focuses on building a "credible minimum deterrence" rather than engaging in a massive nuclear arms race.
This ensures India has enough capability to inflict unacceptable damage on an adversary, guaranteeing its security and independent foreign policy, without unnecessarily escalating global tensions.
3. No First Use Policy and Disarmament Advocacy (Global Disarmament): Unlike many nuclear-armed states, India strictly adheres to a 'No First Use' (NFU) policy, meaning it will never initiate a nuclear strike.
Furthermore, India has always been a vocal advocate at the UN for universal, verifiable, and non-discriminatory global nuclear disarmament, proving its ultimate goal is peace, and weapons are retained merely out of situational necessity.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The statement is justified by India's assertion of autonomy through the rejection of discriminatory treaties (NPT/CTBT) and maintenance of minimum deterrence, balanced by its peaceful NFU doctrine and continuous advocacy for universal nuclear disarmament.