Concept:
The given proposition is:
\[
\text{All Philosophers are Logicians}
\]
This is an A-type universal affirmative proposition:
\[
\text{All } S \text{ are } P
\]
Here:
\[
S = \text{Philosophers}
\]
\[
P = \text{Logicians}
\]
Step 1: Understand the meaning.
The statement means every philosopher belongs to the class of logicians.
So, if someone is a philosopher, then that person is also a logician.
Step 2: Check option (A).
If all philosophers are logicians, then it is also true that:
\[
\text{Some Philosophers are Logicians}
\]
provided philosophers exist.
So, option (A) is not false.
Step 3: Check option (B).
Option (B) says:
\[
\text{No Philosophers are Logicians}
\]
This directly contradicts:
\[
\text{All Philosophers are Logicians}
\]
So, option (B) is false.
Step 4: Check option (C).
If some philosophers exist and all philosophers are logicians, then some logicians are philosophers.
So, option (C) is not false.
Step 5: Check option (D).
If all philosophers are logicians, then no philosopher is a non-logician.
So, option (D) is also consistent.
Hence:
\[
\boxed{\text{No Philosophers are Logicians}}
\]