Step 1: Recall the setup.
Let S(Ei) be the starting-order position and C(Ei) be the completion-order position of student E-i, with S(Ei) not equal to i and C(Ei) not equal to i for each student, and the last student to start being the first to complete.
Step 2: Recall the valid starting order.
As established from the derangement analysis, the only valid starting order is E-3 first (S = 1), E-1 second (S = 2), E-2 last (S = 3). The alternative arrangement forces E-1 to both start last and complete first, which breaks the rule that C(E1) cannot equal 1, so it is ruled out.
Step 3: Apply the last-to-start-is-first-to-complete rule.
Since E-2 starts last, E-2 must be first to complete, so C(E2) = 1.
Step 4: Assign the remaining completion positions.
Positions 2 and 3 remain for E-1 and E-3. Since C(E3) cannot equal 3 (E-3's own digit), E-3 must take position 2, so C(E3) = 2, leaving C(E1) = 3.
Step 5: Check this is a valid derangement.
C(E1) = 3 (not 1), C(E2) = 1 (not 2), C(E3) = 2 (not 3): none of the completion positions match the student's own digit, so this is consistent.
Step 6: Answer the question.
Since C(E1) = 3, E-1 is the last student to complete the assignment, which is option (1).