Concept:
Let a function be defined as $f: X \to Y$, where $X$ is the domain and $Y$ is the codomain.
• One-to-one (Injective): A function $f$ is one-one if distinct elements in the domain have distinct images in the codomain. Mathematically, $f(x_1) = f(x_2) \implies x_1 = x_2$.
• Onto (Surjective): A function $f$ is onto if every element in the codomain $Y$ has at least one pre-image in the domain $X$. That is, for every $y \in Y$, there must exist an $x \in X$ such that $f(x) = y$.
In this specific problem, both the domain and the codomain are the set of natural numbers $\mathbb{N} = \{1, 2, 3, 4, \dots\}$.
Step 1: Detailed mathematical analysis of Assertion (A).
The given function is $f: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ defined by $f(x) = x^3 + 2$.
Part I: Testing for One-One Functionality
Let $x_1, x_2 \in \mathbb{N}$ such that their functional outputs are equal:
\[
f(x_1) = f(x_2)
\]
Substitute the algebraic definition of the function into the equation:
\[
x_1^3 + 2 = x_2^3 + 2
\]
Subtracting 2 from both sides of the equality yields:
\[
x_1^3 = x_2^3
\]
Taking the real cube root on both sides gives:
\[
x_1 = x_2
\]
Since $f(x_1) = f(x_2)$ uniquely dictates that $x_1 = x_2$, the function is verified to be strictly one-one (injective).
Part II: Testing for Onto Functionality
Let $y$ be an arbitrary element belonging to the codomain $\mathbb{N}$. We set up the relation to solve for the pre-image $x$:
\[
y = x^3 + 2 \quad \implies \quad x^3 = y - 2 \quad \implies \quad x = (y - 2)^{1/3}
\]
For $f$ to be onto, this computed value of $x$ must be a natural number ($x \in \mathbb{N}$) for every natural number $y \in \mathbb{N}$.
Let us test a counterexample from the codomain, say $y = 1 \in \mathbb{N}$:
\[
x = (1 - 2)^{1/3} = (-1)^{1/3} = -1 \notin \mathbb{N}
\]
Let us test another element from the codomain, say $y = 4 \in \mathbb{N}$:
\[
x = (4 - 2)^{1/3} = (2)^{1/3} \approx 1.26 \notin \mathbb{N}
\]
Since there are many elements in the codomain (such as $1, 2, 4, 5$, etc.) that do not possess a corresponding valid pre-image $x$ in the domain $\mathbb{N}$, the function is not onto (not surjective).
Combining both findings, the function is one-one but not onto. Thus, Assertion (A) is completely TRUE.
Step 2: Detailed mathematical analysis of Reason (R).
Let us inspect the phrasing of Reason (R): "Since $\forall y \in \mathbb{N}$ (Codomain), there does not exist $x = (y - 2)^{1/3}$ in $\mathbb{N}$".
The quantifier used here is the universal quantifier $\forall$ (which stands for "for all" or "every"). The statement asserts that for every single value of $y \in \mathbb{N}$, a natural pre-image $x$ fails to exist. Let us verify if this claim holds true universally by substituting specific values of $y$:
Consider $y = 3 \in \mathbb{N}$ (Codomain):
\[
x = (3 - 2)^{1/3} = (1)^{1/3} = 1
\]
Since $1 \in \mathbb{N}$ (Domain), a valid natural pre-image does exist for $y = 3$ because $f(1) = 1^3 + 2 = 3$.
Consider $y = 10 \in \mathbb{N}$ (Codomain):
\[
x = (10 - 2)^{1/3} = (8)^{1/3} = 2
\]
Since $2 \in \mathbb{N}$ (Domain), a valid natural pre-image does exist for $y = 10$ because $f(2) = 2^3 + 2 = 10$.
Because there are values of $y \in \mathbb{N}$ for which a natural number $x$ does exist, the sweeping declaration that there is no pre-image $\forall y \in \mathbb{N}$ is logically incorrect. The statement is flawed due to the misuse of the universal quantifier. To be correct, it should state that there exist some values of $y$ for which no pre-image exists. Consequently, Reason (R) is mathematically FALSE.