Comprehension

Declining a Royal Gift

This excerpt from a Sufi text describes the proceedings at Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s hospice in 1313:

I (the author, Amir Hasan Sijzi) has the good fortune of kissing his (Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s) feet... At this time a local ruler had sent him the deed of ownership to two gardens and much land, along with the provisions and tools for their maintenance. The ruler had also made it clear that he was relinquishing all his rights to both the gardens and land. The master...had not accepted that gift. Instead, he had lamented: “What have I to do with gardens and fields and lands?... None of .... our spiritual masters had engaged in such activity.”

Then he told an appropriate story: “.... Sultan Ghiyasuddin, who at that time was still known as Ulugh Khan, came to visit Shaikh Fariduddin (and) offered some money and ownership deeds for four villages to the Shaikh, the money being for the benefit of the dervishes (Sufis), and the land of his use. Smiling, Shaikh al Islam (Fariduddin) said: Give me the money. I will dispense it to the dervishes. But as for those land deeds, keep them. There are many who long for them. Give them away to such persons.”

Question: 1

Mention the offering by the local ruler to the Sufi saint Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya.

Show Hint

The ruler's offering comprised three distinct parts: 1. Ownership deeds for two gardens, 2. A substantial plot of land, and 3. Tools and provisions required for their physical maintence.
Updated On: Jul 28, 2026
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Identifying the Primary Gift Elements:
According to the historical Sufi text documenting the proceedings at the hospice (khanqah) in $1313$, a local ruler sent a major material offering to the Sufi saint Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya. This offering consisted of a formal deed of ownership (patta) for two fully cultivated gardens and a substantial tract of land.

Step 2: Identifying the Supporting Agricultural Items:

In addition to the land deeds, the ruler dispatched the necessary physical provisions, agricultural tools, and maintence equipment. The ruler made it explicit in his message that he was completely relinquishing all of his royal administrative and proprietary rights to both the gardens and the fields.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

What was the reaction of the Sufi saint to the offerings?

Show Hint

The Chishti Sufi masters adhered strictly to a life of voluntary poverty (faqr) and independence. They rejected permanent landed estates to avoid becoming entangled in local administration or becoming dependent on royal courts.
Updated On: Jul 28, 2026
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Immediate and Firm Rejection:
The Sufi master Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya completely refused to accept the royal offering. Instead of showing gratitude, he lamented the situation, rhetorically questioning his relationship with worldly assets by asking, “What have I to do with gardens and fields and lands?”

Step 2: Adherence to Spiritual Lineage:

He justified his rejection by citing the strict traditions of his spiritual order. He asserted that none of his spiritual masters (pirs) or predecessors in the Chishti lineage had ever engaged in worldly agricultural activities or accepted fixed landed property, as it compromised their spiritual independence.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Why did the Sufi saint accept money? Explain.

Show Hint

While land deeds bound the spiritual master to state bureaucracy and worldly property magement, cash dotions (futuh) allowed for immediate distribution to the poor, maintaining the khanqah's self-sacrificing lifestyle.
Updated On: Jul 28, 2026
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Immediate Charity and Direct Relief:
The Sufi master accepted unconditiol monetary dotions (futuh) because cash was a highly liquid resource. It could be distributed immediately on the very same day to the dervishes, travelers, widows, and the poor who frequented the hospice, satisfying their immediate physical needs for food, clothing, and shelter.

Step 2: Avoiding State Dependency and Land Magement:

Unlike land deeds, which permanently tied the khanqah to state land-revenue administration, disputes, and political surveillance, cash dotions carried no long-term institutiol obligations. By immediately spending all received funds, the Sufi saints avoided accumulating wealth and maintained their distance from the political authority of the Delhi Sultate.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0