Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Flumes are hydraulic structures designed to measure the rate of flow in open channels.
The Parshall flume and the Cut-throat flume are two widely used throat-type and throat-less flumes in irrigation water measurement.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let us evaluate each of the given statements:
- Statement (A): "The cut-throat flume is similar to the Parshall flume, but has no throat section, only converging and diverging sections."
This is correct. The Cut-throat flume was developed specifically to overcome some of the construction difficulties of the Parshall flume.
It has a flat floor and lacks the parallel-walled "throat" section of the Parshall flume. The converging section connects directly to the diverging section (hence the name "cut-throat").
- Statement (B): "It gives nearly as accurate measurements as Parshall flume in free flow condition..."
This is correct. Under free-flow conditions, particularly for smaller flume widths, the accuracy of a Cut-throat flume is comparable to that of a Parshall flume.
- Statement (C): "Angles of convergence and divergence of cut-throat flume changes with size of the flume."
This is incorrect. The angles of convergence and divergence in a Cut-throat flume are held constant across different sizes.
The converging section walls converge at a ratio of 3:1, and the diverging section walls diverge at a ratio of 6:1, regardless of the flume size.
- Statement (D): "Because it is easier to construct and install, the cut-throat flume is often preferred..."
This is correct. The flat floor of the Cut-throat flume makes it significantly easier to construct, install, and align in the field compared to the Parshall flume, which has a drop in the throat floor.
Therefore, statements (A), (B), and (D) are correct, making Option (A) the right choice.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The correct option is (A).