Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks about the permissible internal and external aids used in the interpretation of statutes when the literal language of the legislative text is ambiguous.
Step 2: Key Principles and Statutory Provisions:
This falls under the "Interpretation of Statutes" branch of law.
When textual language is unclear, courts rely on statutory aids to find the true intent of the legislature (the "mens legislatora").
Step 3: Detailed Explanation and Analysis:
• The Preamble (i): This is an internal aid to construction.
It sets out the main objectives and scope of the Act and can be used to resolve ambiguities in the main body of the text.
Therefore, statement (i) is correct.
• Statement of Objects and Reasons (ii): This is an external aid.
It explains why the legislation was introduced and helps understand the historical context and the "mischief" the Act sought to remedy.
Therefore, statement (ii) is correct.
• Public Opinion (iii): This is highly subjective, volatile, and lacks legal authority.
Courts cannot interpret statutes based on public opinion.
Therefore, statement (iii) is incorrect.
• The purpose underlying the legislation (iv): This is the basis of "purposive interpretation".
Courts always seek to interpret ambiguous words in a way that advances the legislative purpose rather than defeating it.
Therefore, statement (iv) is correct.
Step 4: Final Answer:
Statements (i), (ii), and (iv) are correct, making Option B the correct choice.