Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the legal meaning and practical implication of the Latin maxim "ut res magis valeat quam pereat" in the context of statutory interpretation.
Step 2: Key Principles and Statutory Provisions:
The maxim translates to: "It is better for a thing to have effect than to perish/be made void."
This is a rule of construction that favors keeping a provision valid and operative.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation and Analysis:
• When a court is faced with two possible interpretations of a statutory provision:
1. One interpretation makes the provision unconstitutional, redundant, or ineffective.
2. The other interpretation makes the provision constitutional, effective, and workable.
• Under the maxim "ut res magis valeat quam pereat", the court must choose the second interpretation to ensure the provision is effective and operative.
• The legislature is presumed not to waste its words or write useless laws.
Therefore, courts should make every effort to find a sensible and workable construction rather than striking down a law or rendering it useless.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The maxim implies that provisions must be construed to be effective and operative, making Option C the correct answer.