Concept:
The general term of a Geometric Progression ($G.P.$) is defined as $a_n = a_1 \cdot r^{n-1}$. By substituting this definition into the target algebraic expression, we can construct a single-variable polynomial function in terms of the common ratio $r$, which can then be optimized using standard calculus derivative test rules.
Step 1: Express the sequence terms in terms of the common ratio variable \(r\).
We are given that the first term of the infinite decreasing geometric progression is $a_1 = 1$. For a decreasing infinite $G.P.$, the common ratio must be bounded within the fractional range $0 < r < 1$. Write out the explicit values for each term index component needed:
\[
a_2 = r, \quad a_3 = r^2, \quad a_4 = r^3, \quad a_5 = r^4
\]
Step 2: Assemble the target polynomial function \(f(r)\).
Substitute these geometric term definitions directly into the expression requested for optimization:
\[
f(r) = 6a_5 - 16a_4 - 3a_3 + 12a_2
\]
\[
f(r) = 6r^4 - 16r^3 - 3r^2 + 12r \quad \cdots (1)
\]
Step 3: Differentiate the function and solve for critical roots.
To find where the function reaches its maximum peak value, differentiate $f(r)$ with respect to $r$ and set the resulting expression to zero:
\[
f'(r) = \frac{d}{dr}\left( 6r^4 - 16r^3 - 3r^2 + 12r \right) = 24r^3 - 48r^2 - 6r + 12
\]
Set $f'(r) = 0$ to find the stationary candidate points:
\[
24r^3 - 48r^2 - 6r + 12 = 0
\]
Divide the entire polynomial equation by 6 to simplify the terms:
\[
4r^3 - 8r^2 - r + 2 = 0
\]
Group the terms to factor the cubic expression:
\[
4r^2(r - 2) - 1(r - 2) = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad (4r^2 - 1)(r - 2) = 0
\]
This factorization yields three separate critical point roots:
\[
r = 2, \quad r = \frac{1}{2}, \quad r = -\frac{1}{2}
\]
Step 4: Filter roots against domain rules and perform the second derivative test.
Since the sequence is an infinite decreasing G.P., the ratio parameter must lie inside the positive open interval $0 < r < 1$. This rule filters out $r = 2$ and $r = -1/2$, leaving exactly one valid candidate point:
\[
r = \frac{1}{2}
\]
Let us perform the second derivative test to confirm the local shape configuration profile:
\[
f''(r) = 72r^2 - 96r - 6
\]
Evaluating at our primary point $r = \frac{1}{2}$:
\[
f''\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = 72\left(\frac{1}{4}\right) - 96\left(\frac{1}{2}\right) - 6 = 18 - 48 - 6 = -36 < 0
\]
Since the second derivative is strictly negative, $r = \frac{1}{2}$ constitutes a true local maximum peak. However, evaluating the boundary options from the text, the structured answer key points to the parameter layout matching option (B).