Let's analyze the statement and the given arguments to determine which argument supports the statement effectively.
Statement: We should plant more trees.
Argument I: Trees help in reducing pollution.
Argument II: Trees occupy too much of the earth's space.
Now, let's examine each argument:
- Evaluation of Argument I:
- Trees play a crucial role in absorbing carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen, which directly contributes to reducing air pollution. This is a well-established scientific fact.
- Additionally, trees help in filtering pollutants by trapping dust and absorbing various harmful gases.
- Therefore, Argument I supports the statement as it provides a valid and beneficial reason to plant more trees.
- Evaluation of Argument II:
- This argument suggests that trees occupy too much space, which may not contribute directly to the negative implications of planting more trees.
- The primary concern here is about space consumption, which doesn't inherently oppose the general benefits of tree planting, such as environmental conservation and improvement.
- Thus, Argument II does not effectively counter or provide a reason against the statement.
Conclusion: After evaluating both arguments, it is clear that Argument I is correct because it provides a substantial and beneficial reason for planting more trees. On the other hand, Argument II does not present a valid reason against tree planting.
Therefore, the correct answer is: I is true.