Step 1: Identify the elements corresponding to the configurations.
\[
[Ne]\,3s^2 3p^1 \rightarrow Al
\]
\[
[Ne]\,3s^2 3p^2 \rightarrow Si
\]
\[
[Ne]\,3s^2 3p^3 \rightarrow P
\]
\[
[Ne]\,3s^2 3p^4 \rightarrow S
\]
Step 2: Recall the trend of first ionisation enthalpy.
Across a period, first ionisation enthalpy generally increases due to increasing effective nuclear charge and decreasing atomic size.
However, extra stability of half-filled and fully-filled subshells causes certain exceptions.
Step 3: Analyze the stability of each configuration.
The configuration
\[
[Ne]\,3s^2 3p^3
\]
has a completely half-filled \(3p\) subshell.
A half-filled subshell possesses extra stability because of:
(i) Symmetrical distribution of electrons
and
(ii) Maximum exchange energy
Therefore, removing an electron from this configuration requires more energy.
Step 4: Compare with \(3p^4\).
Although sulfur \(([Ne]\,3s^2 3p^4)\) lies to the right of phosphorus in the periodic table, one electron pair is present in the \(3p\) orbitals.
Electron-electron repulsion makes removal of an electron comparatively easier. Hence,
\[
IE_1(P)\gt IE_1(S)
\]
Step 5: Final conclusion.
The configuration having the highest first ionisation enthalpy among the given options is
\[
\boxed{[Ne]\,3s^2 3p^3}
\]
corresponding to phosphorus.