Question

S. R. Bommai v. Union of India judgement pertained to

• A. Inter-State Water Dispute
• B. Article 356
• C. Anti - Defection
• D. Fundamental Rights

Hint:

"Bommai" $=$ "Article 356".
This case effectively stopped the frequent and political use of Article 356 by central governments.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Article 356, also known as "President's Rule," allows the Centre to take control of a state's administration. This article was historically misused to topple opposition governments.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) is one of the most critical judgements regarding Indian federalism.
The Supreme Court curtailed the arbitrary use of Article 356 by laying down several guidelines:
- The dismissal of a state government is subject to judicial review.
- The state assembly should not be dissolved immediately after the proclamation.
- The "floor test" in the assembly is the only valid way to determine if a government has lost its majority.
- Secularism was declared a "basic feature" of the Constitution.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The judgement is primarily about the limitations and application of Article 356.