When multiple relations are given, first anchor parent—child pairs, then deduce genders and spouses. The "mother & married to" pair directly yields the father.
Step 1: Parentage of P.
"R has only two children — P and S" \(\Rightarrow\) R is a parent of P.
"P is the daughter of Q" \(\Rightarrow\) Q is also a parent of P.
Hence, \(\{R,\,Q\}\) are P's parents and therefore spouses of each other.
Step 2: Genders of R and Q.
"R is the son of Y" \(\Rightarrow\) R is male.
"R has only two daughters" and the two children are P and S \(\Rightarrow\) P and S are female.
Since P is "the daughter of Q", Q must be female (mother of P and S).
Step 3: Who is Q's father?
"W is the mother of Q" and "W is married to X".
Therefore, the father of Q is \(\boxed{X}\). \[ \boxed{\text{Father of Q} = X} \]
In a small town lived a close-knit family where every relation could be expressed through simple symbols. For instance, when they said \( A \times B \), it meant \( A \) is the father of \( B \), while \( A \div B \) meant \( A \) is the mother of \( B \). The younger ones were often introduced with \( A + B \), meaning \( A \) was the daughter of \( B \), and the bond of brotherhood was shown by \( A - B \) (A is brother of B).
One day, the children in the family turned these symbols into a playful code. Instead of introducing their parents and siblings in words, they spoke only in symbols. “Look,” giggled little Meena, “\( M + N \div O \)!” Everyone laughed, because they knew it meant Meena was the daughter of \( N \), and \( N \) was the mother of \( O \), making her \( O \)’s sister. What started as a code soon became a family game, making the bonds of father, mother, daughter, and brother not just relations, but symbols of love and togetherness. (165 words)