Question:
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India observe that in a penal statute it is the duty of the Court to interpret words of ambiguous meaning in a broad and liberal sense so that they will not become traps for honest, unlearned (in the law) and unwary men
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India observe that in a penal statute it is the duty of the Court to interpret words of ambiguous meaning in a broad and liberal sense so that they will not become traps for honest, unlearned (in the law) and unwary men
Show Hint
While strict construction is the rule for penal laws, the "Seksaria" case reminds us that courts must not choose a literal interpretation if it leads to absurdly trapping innocent citizens who had no criminal intent (mens rea).
Updated On: Jul 7, 2026
- The Seksaria Cotton Mills Ltd v. The State of Bombay.
- Prakash Nath Khanna v. CIT
- M/s Hiralal Ratanlal v. STO
- SEBI v. Ajay Agarwal
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the specific landmark case in which the Supreme Court of India discussed the interpretation of ambiguous words in penal statutes to protect innocent, lay citizens from legal traps.
Step 2: Key Principles and Statutory Provisions:
This relates to the "Interpretation of Penal Statutes".
While the general rule is that penal statutes must be construed strictly, courts must avoid absurd results that turn ambiguous laws into "traps" for innocent people.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation and Analysis:
• In The Seksaria Cotton Mills Ltd v. The State of Bombay (1953 SCR 325), the Supreme Court analyzed how penal laws should be read when the language is ambiguous.
• The Court noted that while crimes must be clearly defined, if a penal provision uses ambiguous words, the court must adopt a sensible, fair interpretation.
It should not stretch the language to create a crime where none was clearly intended.
• The Court observed that laws should not become traps for honest, unlearned, and unwary men who act in good faith.
The law must be clear enough so that a common citizen can know what is prohibited.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The landmark observation was made in the Seksaria Cotton Mills case, making Option A the correct answer.
The question asks for the specific landmark case in which the Supreme Court of India discussed the interpretation of ambiguous words in penal statutes to protect innocent, lay citizens from legal traps.
Step 2: Key Principles and Statutory Provisions:
This relates to the "Interpretation of Penal Statutes".
While the general rule is that penal statutes must be construed strictly, courts must avoid absurd results that turn ambiguous laws into "traps" for innocent people.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation and Analysis:
• In The Seksaria Cotton Mills Ltd v. The State of Bombay (1953 SCR 325), the Supreme Court analyzed how penal laws should be read when the language is ambiguous.
• The Court noted that while crimes must be clearly defined, if a penal provision uses ambiguous words, the court must adopt a sensible, fair interpretation.
It should not stretch the language to create a crime where none was clearly intended.
• The Court observed that laws should not become traps for honest, unlearned, and unwary men who act in good faith.
The law must be clear enough so that a common citizen can know what is prohibited.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The landmark observation was made in the Seksaria Cotton Mills case, making Option A the correct answer.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top KLEE LLM Legal Studies Questions
- Raw materials based on which law creates certain rights and duties are called
- Source of law which consist in declaration of legal rules by a competent authority.
- Law is what the court has decided in respect of any particular set of facts, prior to such a decision , the opinion of lawyer is only a guess and this cannot be treated as law unless the court so decides by its judicial pronouncement. Consider the above observation and find which of the statement is correct?
- Consider the meaning of the maxim ‘cessante ratione legis cessat ipsa lex’ and see which of the following satisfies the essence of the maxim?
- Consider the following statements and identify which of the statements reflect the philosophy of Feminist school of thought?
View More Questions
Top KLEE LLM Interpretation of Statutes Questions
- Which of the following statements are correct?
When the language of a statute is ambiguous, the factors that may be taken into consideration to ascertain its intention are: -
(i) The preamble to the statute.
(ii) The statement of objects of and reasons for bringing it on the statute book.
(iii) Public opinion.
(iv) The purpose underlying the legislation. - It is a well settled canon of interpretation of statutes that _______________ must be regarded as the only source of its intention.
- Choose the most appropriate option.
Where an Act confers a jurisdiction, it impliedly also grants _______________, as are essentially necessary to its execution. - The phrase “cum inverbis nulla ambiguitas est, non debet admitti voluntatis quaestio”, in the context of tax law, provides: -
- The rule of interpretation is that the taxation statute must be interpreted ________.
View More Questions
Top KLEE LLM Questions
- Raw materials based on which law creates certain rights and duties are called
- Source of law which consist in declaration of legal rules by a competent authority.
- Law is what the court has decided in respect of any particular set of facts, prior to such a decision , the opinion of lawyer is only a guess and this cannot be treated as law unless the court so decides by its judicial pronouncement. Consider the above observation and find which of the statement is correct?
- Consider the meaning of the maxim ‘cessante ratione legis cessat ipsa lex’ and see which of the following satisfies the essence of the maxim?
- Consider the following statements and identify which of the statements reflect the philosophy of Feminist school of thought?
View More Questions