Step 1: Concept:
This problem addresses the thermodynamic concepts of reversible versus irreversible processes, mechanical equilibrium, and the driving forces behind gas compression.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
- A process is reversible if the system is in mechanical equilibrium with its surroundings at every step, meaning the driving force (pressure difference) is infinitesimally small: $P_{ex} \approx P_{int} \pm dP$.
- A process is irreversible if there is a finite, measurable driving force: e.g., $P_{ex} \gg P_{int}$.
Step 3: Step-by-step Explanation:
• Evaluating Assertion (A): The assertion specifies that $P_{ex}$ is measurably greater than the internal pressure $P$. This large pressure gradient drives an irreversible compression. Because the difference $P_{ex} - P$ is finite (not infinitesimal), a tiny infinitesimal decrease in $P_{ex}$ will still leave the external pressure substantially greater than the internal pressure ($P_{ex} - dP_{ex} > P$). Consequently, the gas will continue to be compressed; the direction of the process will not change. Therefore, Assertion (A) is physically sound and correct.
• Evaluating Reason (R): The reason claims the system is in mechanical equilibrium and the process is thermodynamically reversible. By definition, mechanical equilibrium requires that the pressures are balanced ($P_{ex} = P$). Since Assertion (A) explicitly established that $P_{ex}$ is measurably greater than $P$, the system is fundamentally not in equilibrium. A process driven by a large, finite pressure difference is inherently irreversible, not reversible. Therefore, Reason (R) is false.
Step 4: Final Answer:
Assertion (A) is true, but Reason (R) is false. This corresponds to option (C).