Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks to evaluate several statements regarding the law of agency under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and identify which statements are correct.
Step 2: Key Legal Principles and Approach:
The relevant rules on the definitions, capacity, and consideration of agency are located in Sections 182, 184, and 185 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
• Evaluating Statement (i): "No consideration is necessary to create an agency."
• This is correct. Section 185 of the Act explicitly states: "No consideration is necessary to create an agency." Agency is an exception to the general rule of Section 25.
• Evaluating Statement (ii): "As between the principal and third persons, any person may become an agent."
• This is correct. Section 184 states: "As between the principal and third persons, any person may become an agent..."
• Even a minor or a person of unsound mind can act as an agent and bind the principal to third parties, though they cannot be held personally liable to the principal.
• Evaluating Statement (iii): "An 'agent' is a person employed to do any act for another, or to represent another in dealings with third persons."
• This is correct. It is the verbatim definition of an "agent" as provided in Section 182 of the Act.
• Evaluating Statement (iv): "The consideration for agency must be adequate depending on the nature of the agency."
• This is incorrect. Since Section 185 clarifies that no consideration is required at all to create an agency, there is no requirement of "adequate consideration". Gratuitous agencies are perfectly valid.
• Therefore, only statements (i), (ii), and (iii) are correct, which corresponds to Option (A).
Step 4: Final Answer:
Statements (i), (ii), and (iii) are statutory facts of agency law, whereas statement (iv) is incorrect, making Option (A) the correct answer.