Step 1: Concept:
The question is testing knowledge of the fundamental Density of States (DOS) mathematical formulas for differently dimensioned systems (Bulk, Quantum Well, Quantum Wire, and Quantum Dot).
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
The energy dependency of the DOS function $D(E)$ changes dramatically depending on quantum confinement:
- 3D (Bulk): $D(E) \propto E^{1/2}$ (continuous parabolic curve).
- 2D (Quantum Well): $D(E) \propto \sum \Theta(E - E_n)$, where $\Theta$ is the Heaviside step function. The DOS is constant within a subband, rising in discrete stair-steps.
- 1D (Quantum Wire): $D(E) \propto \sum (E - E_n)^{-1/2}$ (sharp peaks that decay).
- 0D (Quantum Dot): $D(E) \propto \sum \delta(E - E_n)$ (discrete delta-function spikes).
Step 3: Step-by-step Explanation:
• Let's evaluate the given mathematical options against our standard models:
• (4) $D(E) = \frac{3{2} K_3 E^{1/2}$:} The $E^{1/2}$ dependence is the classic signature of a standard unconfined 3D bulk material.
• (2) $D(E) = \frac{1{2} K_1 \sum d_i (E-E_{iw})^{-1/2}$:} The $(E-E_{iw})^{-1/2}$ dependence contains singularities and represents the DOS of a 1D structure, a Quantum Wire.
• (3) $D(E) = K_o \sum d_i \delta(E-E_{iw})^2$: The presence of the delta function $\delta$ indicates fully discrete atomic-like energy levels, characteristic of a 0D structure, a Quantum Dot.
• (1) $D(E) = K_2 \sum d_i$: In an ideal 2D system, once an energy level $E_{iw}$ is surpassed, that subband contributes a constant value to the DOS. The total DOS is simply the sum of these constant contributions (step functions). The expression shows a summation of constant terms without energy dependency $E$ attached to the active terms, perfectly capturing the flat, step-like nature of a Quantum Well.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The correct representation for a quantum well is option (A).