Step 1: Understanding the Question:
We must examine the coordinate complex ion $[\text{Ni}(\text{CN})_4]^{2-}$ using Valence Bond Theory (VBT) and crystal field parameters to locate the mathematically or conceptually false statement.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
Let's first determine the basic chemical oxidation state of Nickel (Ni) in the complex by setting up a charge balance equation:
$$\text{Oxidation State of Ni} + 4 \times (\text{Charge of CN}^-) = \text{Net Charge of Complex}$$
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Let the oxidation state of Ni be $x$.
$$x + 4(-1) = -2$$
$$x - 4 = -2 \implies x = +2$$
Thus, the oxidation state of Ni is $+2$. This immediately reveals that statement (C) which claims the oxidation state is $+6$ is completely incorrect.
Let's double-check the structural properties for conceptual validation:
Ground state configuration of Ni ($Z=28$) is $[\text{Ar}]\,3\text{d}^8 4\text{s}^2$. For $\text{Ni}^{2+}$, the configuration is $[\text{Ar}]\,3\text{d}^8 4\text{s}^0$.
Cyanide ($\text{CN}^-$) is a powerful
strong-field ligand. According to VBT, it forces the pairing of the two unpaired electrons residing in the $3\text{d}$ subshell prior to hybridization (Statement A is correct).
This forced pairing leaves exactly one internal $3\text{d}$ orbital empty. The $\text{Ni}^{2+}$ ion blends this single $3\text{d}$ orbital with one $4\text{s}$ and two $4\text{p}$ orbitals to give a set of four
$\text{dsp}^2$ hybrid orbitals (Statement B is correct).
Any coordination compound featuring $\text{dsp}^2$ hybrid orbitals displays a
square planar geometry (Statement D is correct).
Step 4: Final Answer:
The statement that is NOT true is option (C).