Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks for the definition and core principle of the "Tobar Doctrine," which governs the international recognition of revolutionary or extra-constitutional governments.
Step 2: Key Legal Principles and Approach:
In international law, the recognition of governments deals with whether a newly established regime should be accepted as the official representative of a state.
Different doctrines exist to guide states in this decision (e.g., the Estrada Doctrine, the Tobar Doctrine, and the Jefferson/De Facto Doctrine).
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
• Origin of the Tobar Doctrine: The doctrine was formulated in 1907 by Dr. Carlos Tobar, the Foreign Minister of Ecuador.
• It was subsequently incorporated into a treaty between Central American states in 1907 and 1923.
• Core Principle of the Doctrine: The Tobar Doctrine (also known as the Doctrine of Constitutional Legitimacy) states that states should refuse to recognize any government that rises to power through extra-constitutional means, such as a coup d'état, revolution, or civil war.
• Under this doctrine, recognition should be withheld until the new regime has been legitimized by the population through democratic and constitutional processes (such as free elections).
• Purpose of the Doctrine: The primary goal of the Tobar Doctrine was to discourage revolutions, military coups, and political instability by denying international legitimacy to unconstitutional regimes.
• Comparing this definition with the options, Option (B) accurately states that governments which come to power by extra-constitutional means should not be recognized until the change is accepted by the people.
• Therefore, Option (B) is the correct answer.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The Tobar Doctrine advocates for constitutional legitimacy, advising against the recognition of revolutionary regimes until they are democratically approved, making Option (B) the correct answer.