Question:

Under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, which situation makes the consent of a wife unnecessary for adoption?

Show Hint

Section 7: Wife's consent is mandatory for adoption by a husband, unless she is no longer Hindu, is of unsound mind (judicially declared), or has renounced the world!
Updated On: Jul 13, 2026
  • She has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion.
  • She is living separately without legal separation.
  • She refuses consent due to personal disagreement.
  • none of the above
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Approach Solution - 1

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Section 7 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, requires the consent of the wife for a married Hindu male to adopt a child.

Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
- The proviso to Section 7 states that the consent of the wife is not necessary if she has ceased to be a Hindu, has finally and completely renounced the world, or has been declared to be of unsound mind by a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Other scenarios, like personal disagreement or separation without a legal decree, do not dispense with the requirement for consent.

Step 3: Final Answer:
Conversion to another religion is a valid ground where consent is unnecessary. Option (A) is correct.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Section 7 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 makes the wife's consent mandatory for a married Hindu male's adoption, subject to three specific exceptions written into its proviso. Each option can be checked against those three exceptions.

  1. (A) She has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion: This is one of the three grounds expressly listed in the proviso to Section 7, ceasing to be a Hindu removes her from the class of persons whose consent the section protects, so her consent is no longer required. This option is correct.
  2. (B) She is living separately without legal separation: Living apart informally does not end the marriage in the eyes of the law, and the proviso does not mention mere separation as a ground at all. The husband still needs her consent even if the couple are not living together. This option is incorrect.
  3. (C) She refuses consent due to personal disagreement: A wife's disagreement is precisely the situation the consent requirement is meant to respect, the husband cannot sidestep her refusal simply because he disagrees with her reasons. This option is incorrect.
  4. (D) None of the above: Since option (A) squarely matches one of the statutory exceptions, this option cannot be correct.

Checking each situation against the three statutory exceptions shows that only conversion out of the Hindu religion removes the need for the wife's consent among the choices given.

Therefore, the correct answer is She has ceased to be a Hindu by conversion.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0