Step 1: Rewrite each line in a simple form:
The first equation is \(\vec{r}\times\vec{a} = \vec{b}\times\vec{a}\), so \((\vec{r}-\vec{b})\times\vec{a} = \vec{0}\). A zero cross product means \(\vec{r}-\vec{b}\) is parallel to \(\vec{a}\). So the first line is \(\vec{r} = \vec{b} + \lambda\vec{a}\).
Step 2: Write the first line in components:
With \(\vec{a} = (1,1,0)\) and \(\vec{b} = (1,0,-1)\):
\[ \vec{r} = (1+\lambda,\ \lambda,\ -1) \]
Step 3: Write the second line:
The second equation \(\vec{r}\times\vec{b} = \vec{a}\times\vec{b}\) gives \((\vec{r}-\vec{a})\times\vec{b} = \vec{0}\). So \(\vec{r} = \vec{a} + \mu\vec{b} = (1+\mu,\ 1,\ -\mu)\).
Step 4: Find the point of intersection:
Equate the components of the two lines. From the \(y\) coordinates, \(\lambda = 1\). From the \(z\) coordinates, \(-1 = -\mu\), so \(\mu = 1\). The \(x\) coordinates are \(1+\lambda = 2\) and \(1+\mu = 2\), which agree. So the point is \((2, 1, -1)\).
Step 5: Why the other options are wrong:
The first line always has \(z = -1\), and the second always has \(y = 1\). Options (B), (C) and (D) have \(z = 1\), which breaks the first line, so none of them can be the common point.
Final Answer:
The lines meet at \((2, 1, -1)\), which is option (A).
\[ \boxed{(2,\,1,\,-1)} \]