Concept:
The Kuznets Curve, proposed by Simon Kuznets, describes an inverted U-shaped relationship between economic growth and income inequality.
According to the hypothesis:
• In the early stages of development, inequality tends to increase.
• As development continues, inequality eventually declines due to structural transformation, better employment opportunities and redistribution.
However, empirical evidence suggests that the Kuznets hypothesis is not universally applicable. Its validity depends on the economic structure and institutional conditions of a country.
Step 1: Understand the implication of recent Indian evidence.
Recent evidence indicates that growth in India has been concentrated in capital-intensive sectors.
This results in:
• Limited employment generation.
• Higher returns to capital than labour.
• Persistent income inequality.
Thus, the expected decline in inequality predicted by the Kuznets Curve has not occurred automatically.
Step 2: Interpret the implication for the Kuznets Curve.
The evidence suggests that the Kuznets hypothesis is not universally valid.
Instead, it depends upon:
• Nature of economic growth.
• Employment generation.
• Structural transformation.
• Government policies and institutions.
Therefore,
\[
\boxed{
\text{The Kuznets Curve operates only under certain economic conditions.}
}
\]
Step 3: Examine the options.
• [(A)] It is not limited to small economies.
• [(B)] It is not specific to Asia.
• [(C)] It is not confined only to agrarian economies.
• [(D)] Its validity depends upon appropriate economic conditions.
Hence,
\[
\boxed{\text{Correct Answer}=(D)}
\]