Question:
Supreme Court of India held that it is permanent obligation of every member of medical profession either government or private to give medical aid to every injured person brought for treatment immediately without waiting for procedural formalities in the case of-
Supreme Court of India held that it is permanent obligation of every member of medical profession either government or private to give medical aid to every injured person brought for treatment immediately without waiting for procedural formalities in the case of-
Show Hint
The Parmanand Katara case is the key judgment that establishes the "Life First" principle in medical emergencies in India, making immediate treatment a legal and constitutional duty for all doctors, overriding procedural hurdles.
Updated On: Nov 18, 2025
- Common Cause V/s Union of India (1996) 1 SC 753
- Peoples Union of India, AIR 1983 SC 339
- Parmanand Katara V/s Union of India ,AIR 1989 SC 2039
- Lakshmi Kant Pandey V/s Union of India (1984) 25 SC 244
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
In the landmark case of Parmanand Katara v. Union of India (1989), the Supreme Court elevated the professional obligation of doctors to a legal duty enforceable under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court held that every doctor, whether at a government or a private hospital, has a professional duty to extend medical assistance to an injured person to preserve life without waiting for legal formalities like a police report. The Court emphasized that the effort to save a person's life should be the top priority, superseding any procedural or legal requirements.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top AIBE Legal Studies Questions
- The concept of freedom of trade and commerce mentioned in the Indian Constitution is motivated from the experience of the following country?
- Which of the following writ is issued to enforce the performance of public duties by the authority?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act had made the provision for publishing Hindi Translation of the Constitution?
- Which of the following is the landmark judgment on the Colourable legislation?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act was passed in light of the advisory opinion received in Re Berubari case?
View More Questions
Top AIBE Fundamental Rights and Duties Questions
- A jus in personam means a right against _________:
- Right to know the antecedents of the candidates in the election flow from:
- Anuradha Bhasin Vs Union Of India on 10 January, 2020 relates to a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking issuance of an appropriate writ:
- Right to the property was eliminated from the list of Fundamental Rights during the tenure of
- As per Article 16, No citizen shall, on grounds only of ........ or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of, any employment or office under the State.
View More Questions
Top AIBE Questions
- The concept of freedom of trade and commerce mentioned in the Indian Constitution is motivated from the experience of the following country?
- Which of the following writ is issued to enforce the performance of public duties by the authority?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act had made the provision for publishing Hindi Translation of the Constitution?
- Which of the following is the landmark judgment on the Colourable legislation?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act was passed in light of the advisory opinion received in Re Berubari case?
View More Questions