Question:
Statement:
1. Some players are singers
2. All singers are tall
Conclusion:
I. Some players are tall
II. All players are tall
Statement:
1. Some players are singers
2. All singers are tall
Conclusion:
I. Some players are tall
II. All players are tall
1. Some players are singers
2. All singers are tall
Conclusion:
I. Some players are tall
II. All players are tall
Show Hint
In logical reasoning, always check if the conclusion can be directly derived from the given statements. Be cautious about generalizing information beyond what is provided.
Updated On: Dec 19, 2025
- if only conclusion I follows
- if only conclusion II follows
- if either I or II follows
- if neither I nor II follows
- if both follow
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Analyze the statements and conclusions.
We are given two statements:
- (1) Some players are singers.
- (2) All singers are tall.
From statement (1), we know that some players belong to the group of singers. From statement (2), we are told that all singers are tall. This implies that some players who are singers are also tall. However, it does not logically mean that all players are tall, as only the players who are singers are tall, not all players.
Step 2: Analyze the conclusions.
- Conclusion I: Some players are tall. This conclusion is valid because some players (those who are singers) are tall. Thus, conclusion I follows.
- Conclusion II: All players are tall. This conclusion does not follow because the information only tells us that some players (those who are singers) are tall, not that all players are tall. Therefore, conclusion II does not follow.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A) if only conclusion I follows, as conclusion I is valid while conclusion II is not.
We are given two statements:
- (1) Some players are singers.
- (2) All singers are tall.
From statement (1), we know that some players belong to the group of singers. From statement (2), we are told that all singers are tall. This implies that some players who are singers are also tall. However, it does not logically mean that all players are tall, as only the players who are singers are tall, not all players.
Step 2: Analyze the conclusions.
- Conclusion I: Some players are tall. This conclusion is valid because some players (those who are singers) are tall. Thus, conclusion I follows.
- Conclusion II: All players are tall. This conclusion does not follow because the information only tells us that some players (those who are singers) are tall, not that all players are tall. Therefore, conclusion II does not follow.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A) if only conclusion I follows, as conclusion I is valid while conclusion II is not.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top MICAT Logical Reasoning Questions
- And what are we to say of man? Is he a speck of dust crawling helplessly on a small planet, as the astronomers see it? Or is he, as the chemists might hold, a heap of chemicals put together in a cunning way? Or, finally, is man what he appears to Hamlet, noble in reason, infinite in faculty? Is man, perhaps, all of these at once?
- Life consists of puzzling questions. One cannot settle them by carrying out experiments in a laboratory, and those of an independent frame of mind are unwilling to fall back on the pronouncements of dispensers of universal nostrums. To such as these the history of philosophy supplies what answer can be given. In studying this difficult subject we learn what others at other times have thought of these matters.
- Statement:
1. All chalk is not cheese
2. The moon is made of cheese
Conclusion:
I. The moon is made of chalk
II. The moon is not made of chalk
- Statement:
1. No engineer is a doctor
2. Some doctors are MBAs
Conclusion:
I. Some doctors are not engineers
II. Some MBAs are not engineers
- How are Harish and Sarita related?
Statements:
I. Harish's grandfather married Sarita's maternal aunt.
II. Harish and Sarita study in the same class.
View More Questions
Top MICAT Logical Deduction Questions
- Statement:
1. All chalk is not cheese
2. The moon is made of cheese
Conclusion:
I. The moon is made of chalk
II. The moon is not made of chalk
- Statement:
1. No engineer is a doctor
2. Some doctors are MBAs
Conclusion:
I. Some doctors are not engineers
II. Some MBAs are not engineers
- How are Harish and Sarita related?
Statements:
I. Harish's grandfather married Sarita's maternal aunt.
II. Harish and Sarita study in the same class.
- How many students are there in a class?
Statements:
I. When arranged in alphabetical order, Dilip's name is the 15th and Vinod's is the 37th.
II. In reverse order, Vinod's name is 3rd.
- Which of the integers A, B, C, D, E are odd numbers?
Statements:
I. A, B, C, D, E are consecutive integers.
II. A and B are prime numbers.
Top MICAT Questions
- Explain the key message of the following paragraph in two lines.
For us it is above all a question of changing purpose and function of music. Not by using more and more intoxicating devices, but by using devices in a more reasonable way. What we have to do is clarify the emotions of our listeners and not confuse them. The worst thing I can think of is music that causes emotional confusion. Even that archaic, intoxicating ‘musical’ element, which all music contains, must be utilized consciously and not spontaneously.
— Hanns Eisler
- Explain the key message of the following paragraph in two lines.
The poet didn’t scare off when they said he was a rebel. Poetry is rebellion. The poet was not offended when he was called subversive. Life transcends all structures, and there are new rules of conduct for the soul. The seed sprouts anywhere, all ideas are exotic, we wait for enormous changes every day, we live through the mutation of human order avidly and spring is rebellious.
— Pablo Neruda
The Table given below presents the data on the Japanese Direct Foreign Investment by Industry. Based on the data, select the correct answers from the options given under each question. Enter the alphabet against the question number in the answer booklet.
TOTAL INVESTMENT FROM 1951-1988
- The pattern of Japanese investments is concentrated in the:
- The area where maximum Japanese FDI’s are located is in:
View More Questions