Harding argues for strong objectivity: starting inquiry from marginalized standpoints and making the social–historical location of knowers a subject of investigation in order to produce more objective science $\Rightarrow$ (D)
. (A) describes feminist empiricism, which Harding critiques as insufficient because it underestimates how social location shapes inquiry
. (B) is false since Harding denies value–free science and insists on reflexivity about values
. (C) is false because she does not reject objectivity; she reconstructs it as "strong objectivity"
. \[ \boxed{\text{Therefore, only (D) is correct.}} \]
Consider the following argument:
My brother is a real pig. You should see him eat! If he is a pig, then he is not human.
So he is not human.
Which one of the following evaluations about the argument is true?
Consider the following argument:
My brother is a real pig. You should see him eat! If he is a pig, then he is not human.
So he is not human.
Which one of the following evaluations about the argument is true?