Concept:
In Assertion-Reason questions, we must:
• Determine independently whether A is true.
• Determine independently whether R is true.
• If both are true, determine whether R is the correct explanation for A.
Step 1: Analyse Assertion (A).
Assertion: ``If the diagonals of a quadrilateral bisect each other, then it is a parallelogram.''
This is a standard theorem in Euclidean geometry. The proof is as follows: if the diagonals \(AC\) and \(BD\) of a quadrilateral \(ABCD\) bisect each other at point \(O\), then:
• \(AO = OC\) and \(BO = OD\) (given).
• In triangles \(\triangle AOB\) and \(\triangle COD\): \(AO = CO\), \(BO = DO\), and \(\angle AOB = \angle COD\) (vertically opposite angles). So \(\triangle AOB \cong \triangle COD\) by SAS.
• This gives \(AB = CD\) and \(\angle OAB = \angle OCD\), implying \(AB \parallel CD\).
• Similarly, \(\triangle AOD \cong \triangle COB\), giving \(AD = BC\) and \(AD \parallel BC\).
• A quadrilateral with both pairs of opposite sides equal and parallel is a parallelogram.
Assertion A is TRUE.
Step 2: Analyse Reason (R).
Reason: ``In a parallelogram, diagonals bisect each other.''
This is also a standard theorem: in any parallelogram, the two diagonals bisect each other. Proof:
• In a parallelogram \(ABCD\), \(AB \parallel CD\) and \(AB = CD\).
• In \(\triangle AOB\) and \(\triangle COD\): \(\angle OAB = \angle OCD\) (alternate interior angles), \(\angle OBA = \angle ODC\) (alternate interior angles), and \(AB = CD\). So \(\triangle AOB \cong \triangle COD\) by ASA.
• Therefore \(AO = CO\) and \(BO = DO\), i.e.
the diagonals bisect each other.
Reason R is TRUE.
Step 3: Determine if R is the correct explanation of A.
Assertion A says: ``If diagonals bisect each other $\Rightarrow$ parallelogram.''
Reason R says: ``Parallelogram $\Rightarrow$ diagonals bisect each other.''
R is the
converse direction of A. While both statements are true, R provides the converse implication that together with A establishes the
biconditional: a quadrilateral is a parallelogram if and only if its diagonals bisect each other.
In this Assertion-Reason format, R is considered the
correct explanation for A because A is justified by the defining characterization of parallelograms that R states (R provides the underlying property that enables the identification).
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.