Question:

Match List-I with List-II.

List-IList-II
A. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of IndiaI. Right to life and personal liberty includes Right to privacy
B. Narendra Kumar v. State of HaryanaII. Right to livelihood is an integral facet of right to life
C. Hussain v. Union of IndiaIII. Timely delivery of justice is part of human right
D. Police Commissioner of Delhi v. Registrar, High Court of DelhiIV. Assurance of fair trial is the first imperative of dispensation of justice

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Show Hint

K.S. Puttaswamy is the landmark case on Right to Privacy under Article 21.
Updated On: May 22, 2026
  • A-I, B-II, C-III, D-IV
  • A-IV, B-III, C-II, D-I
  • A-I, B-III, C-IV, D-II
  • A-I, B-II, C-IV, D-III
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Concept: Landmark constitutional cases are often matched with the principles laid down by them.

Step 1:
Match K.S. Puttaswamy.
K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India is the landmark case recognizing the Right to Privacy as part of life and personal liberty. \[ A \rightarrow I \]

Step 2:
Match Narendra Kumar.
The case is connected with the principle that right to livelihood is an integral part of right to life. \[ B \rightarrow II \]

Step 3:
Match Hussain v. Union of India.
This case is associated with timely delivery of justice as part of human right. \[ C \rightarrow III \]

Step 4:
Match Police Commissioner of Delhi case.
This case is associated with the principle that assurance of fair trial is the first imperative of dispensation of justice. \[ D \rightarrow IV \] Therefore, the correct matching is: \[ A-I,\ B-II,\ C-III,\ D-IV \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0