Concept:
In such matching questions, each sequence follows a distinct numerical pattern. We must identify the pattern in each sequence separately and then match the missing term with the correct value in List-II.
Step 1: Analyze Sequence A.
\[
4,\ 7,\ 12,\ 19,\ 28,\ ?
\]
Find differences:
\[
7-4=3,\quad 12-7=5,\quad 19-12=7,\quad 28-19=9
\]
Pattern:
\[
+3,\ +5,\ +7,\ +9
\]
Next difference:
\[
+11
\]
So,
\[
28 + 11 = 39
\]
Thus, A corresponds to 39 (II).
Step 2: Analyze Sequence B.
\[
28,\ 33,\ 31,\ 36,\ ?,\ 39
\]
Observe pattern:
\[
+5,\ -2,\ +5,\ -2,\ +5
\]
So,
\[
36 - 2 = 34
\]
Thus, missing term is:
\[
34
\]
Hence, B corresponds to 34 (IV).
Step 3: Analyze Sequence C.
\[
125,\ 80,\ 45,\ 20,\ ?
\]
Differences:
\[
80-125 = -45,\quad 45-80 = -35,\quad 20-45 = -25
\]
Pattern:
\[
-45,\ -35,\ -25
\]
Next:
\[
-15
\]
So,
\[
20 - 15 = 5
\]
Thus, C corresponds to 5 (I).
Step 4: Analyze Sequence D.
\[
1,\ 3,\ 4,\ 8,\ 15,\ 27,\ ?
\]
Pattern:
\[
1+2=3,\quad 3+1=4,\quad 4+4=8,\quad 8+7=15,\quad 15+12=27
\]
Differences:
\[
2,\ 1,\ 4,\ 7,\ 12
\]
Now pattern in differences:
\[
-1,\ +3,\ +3,\ +5
\]
Continuing:
\[
+7
\]
So next difference:
\[
12 + 7 = 19
\]
Thus,
\[
27 + 19 = 46
\]
But 46 is not in List-II. Let's re-evaluate using another pattern:
Alternative observation:
\[
1,\ 3,\ 4,\ 8,\ 15,\ 27
\]
Each term is sum of previous two minus 1:
\[
1+3=4,\quad 3+4=7 \neq 8
\]
Try another pattern:
\[
1,\ 3,\ 4,\ 8,\ 15,\ 27
\]
Differences:
\[
2,\ 1,\ 4,\ 7,\ 12
\]
Second differences:
\[
-1,\ +3,\ +3,\ +5
\]
Continuing trend gives next difference = 12 + 7 = 19
Thus:
\[
27 + 19 = 46
\]
Since closest logical structured pattern gives increasing increments, but among given options only remaining unused value is:
\[
50
\]
Thus, D corresponds to 50 (III).
Step 5: Final matching.
\[
A \rightarrow II,\quad B \rightarrow IV,\quad C \rightarrow I,\quad D \rightarrow III
\]
Hence correct option is:
\[
\boxed{(2)\ A\text{-}II,\ B\text{-}IV,\ C\text{-}I,\ D\text{-}III}
\]