Concept:
This question concerns Buddhist epistemology and ontology, especially the theories developed by Dignāga and Dharmakīrti. These thinkers refined Buddhist logic, inference, perception, and linguistic philosophy.
Step 1: Understanding Pratyākṣa.
In Buddhist logic, Pratyākṣa (perception) is defined as direct, immediate, and non-conceptual cognition.
Dignāga defines perception as:
\[
Kalpanāpoḍha
\]
meaning “free from conceptual construction.”
Thus, perception corresponds to:
\[
Nirvikalpaka Jñāna
\]
Hence:
\[
A \rightarrow II
\]
Step 2: Understanding Anumāna.
Anumāna means inference.
Buddhist logic classifies inference into:
• Svārthānumāna -- inference for oneself
• Parārthānumāna -- inference for others
Therefore:
\[
Anumāna \rightarrow Svārtha-Parārtha
\]
Hence:
\[
B \rightarrow III
\]
Step 3: Understanding Apoha.
The theory of Apoha explains meaning through exclusion.
A word does not indicate a universal essence positively; rather, it functions through excluding what it is not.
For example:
\[
\text{Cow} = \text{Not non-cow}
\]
This principle is called:
\[
Atadvyāvartana
\]
meaning exclusion of the non-related.
Hence:
\[
C \rightarrow I
\]
Step 4: Understanding Anātma.
The doctrine of Anātma states that there is no permanent self or soul.
What appears as “personality” is merely a temporary combination of five aggregates called:
\[
Pañcaskandha
\]
These are:
• Rūpa
• Vedanā
• Saṃjñā
• Saṃskāra
• Vijñāna
Hence:
\[
D \rightarrow IV
\]
Step 5: Final Conclusion.
The complete matching becomes:
\[
A-II,\quad B-III,\quad C-I,\quad D-IV
\]
Therefore, the correct answer is:
\[
\boxed{(2)}
\]