Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
A minimum occurs where the path difference is an odd multiple of half a wavelength: \(\Delta=(2n-1)\dfrac\lambda2\).
Step 2: Path difference at a point opposite one slit:
The point is at \(x=\dfrac d2\), so \(\Delta=\dfrac{xd}{D}=\dfrac{d^2}{2D}\).
Step 3: Solve for lambda:
\(\dfrac{d^2}{2D}=(2n-1)\dfrac\lambda2\), so \(\lambda=\dfrac{d^2}{(2n-1)D}\) with \(n=1,2,3,\ldots\)
Step 4: Read off the dependence:
\(\lambda\propto\dfrac{1}{(2n-1)D}\), so \(\lambda\) is inversely proportional to \(D,\ 3D,\ 5D,\ldots\) Option B.
Step 5: Why the other options are wrong.
Even multiples \(2D,4D\) would mean maxima, not minima. Options C and D give the wrong dependence on \(D\).
Final Answer:
Wavelength is inversely proportional to D, 3D, 5D, and so on.
\[ \boxed{\text{(B) }D,\ 3D,\ 5D,\ldots} \]