Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question asks to identify the situation in which the legal presumption of "constructive notice" automatically arises under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Step 2: Key Legal Principles and Approach:
The concept of "notice" (which includes actual notice and constructive notice) is defined in Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Constructive notice is a legal presumption where a person is deemed to have knowledge of a fact, even if they have no actual knowledge, because they would have discovered it had they made reasonable inquiries and exercised due diligence.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
• The Rule of Registration: Under Explanation I to the definition of "notice" in Section 3 of the TPA, where any transaction relating to immovable property is required by law to be and has been effected by a registered instrument, any person subsequently acquiring such property or any part thereof shall be deemed to have notice of such instrument as from the date of registration.
• This means that the public registration of a property agreement serves as an official public record.
• Any subsequent purchaser has a legal duty to search the registry.
• If they fail to do so, the law presumes they have "constructive notice" of the registered transaction, and they cannot claim to be a bona fide purchaser without notice.
• Analyzing other options:
• Fraud or secrecy (Option A) actively conceals facts and prevents notice from arising.
• Notice to relatives (Option C) does not create any general legal presumption of constructive notice to others.
• Therefore, the registration of an agreement (Option B) is the classic situation where constructive notice is legally presumed.
Step 4: Final Answer:
Under Section 3 of the Transfer of Property Act, the registration of an instrument operates as constructive notice to subsequent purchasers, making Option (B) the correct answer.