Question:
In which case was a registered society held to be an "authority" for the purpose of Article 12?
In which case was a registered society held to be an "authority" for the purpose of Article 12?
Show Hint
The Ajay Hasia case expanded the scope of “State” under Article 12 to include bodies performing public functions under government control.
Updated On: Oct 30, 2025
- Sukhdev vs. Bhagatram
- R.D. Shetty vs. International Airport Authority
- Som Prakash vs. Union of India
- Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Background of the case.
In Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib (1981), the Supreme Court held that a society registered under the Societies Registration Act could be considered an "authority" under Article 12 if it is under the control of the government.
Step 2: Principle laid down.
The Court stated that the form of organization (corporation, society, or company) does not matter — what matters is the degree of governmental control.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Hence, a registered society substantially financed and controlled by the government falls within the definition of “State” under Article 12.
In Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib (1981), the Supreme Court held that a society registered under the Societies Registration Act could be considered an "authority" under Article 12 if it is under the control of the government.
Step 2: Principle laid down.
The Court stated that the form of organization (corporation, society, or company) does not matter — what matters is the degree of governmental control.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Hence, a registered society substantially financed and controlled by the government falls within the definition of “State” under Article 12.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top AIBE Legal Studies Questions
- The concept of freedom of trade and commerce mentioned in the Indian Constitution is motivated from the experience of the following country?
- Which of the following writ is issued to enforce the performance of public duties by the authority?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act had made the provision for publishing Hindi Translation of the Constitution?
- Which of the following is the landmark judgment on the Colourable legislation?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act was passed in light of the advisory opinion received in Re Berubari case?
View More Questions
Top AIBE Fundamental Rights and Duties Questions
- A jus in personam means a right against _________:
- Right to know the antecedents of the candidates in the election flow from:
- Anuradha Bhasin Vs Union Of India on 10 January, 2020 relates to a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking issuance of an appropriate writ:
- Right to the property was eliminated from the list of Fundamental Rights during the tenure of
- As per Article 16, No citizen shall, on grounds only of ........ or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of, any employment or office under the State.
View More Questions
Top AIBE Questions
- The concept of freedom of trade and commerce mentioned in the Indian Constitution is motivated from the experience of the following country?
- Which of the following writ is issued to enforce the performance of public duties by the authority?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act had made the provision for publishing Hindi Translation of the Constitution?
- Which of the following is the landmark judgment on the Colourable legislation?
- Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act was passed in light of the advisory opinion received in Re Berubari case?
View More Questions