John Locke’s empiricism holds that knowledge comes from experience, not from innate ideas.
Step 1: Analyzing Locke’s view on essences.
Locke believed that we could never know the real essences of things, only their nominal essences (the characteristics we attribute to them). This is why (A) is correct.
Step 2: Analyzing Locke’s view on science.
Locke proposed that true science is possible in the natural world, as science is based on empirical observation, making (C) incorrect.
Step 3: Analyzing knowledge of God.
Locke argued that knowledge of the existence of God is based on reason, making (D) a correct statement.