Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
In poetics, 'Dosha' (defect) is defined as "Mukhya-artha-hatih" (the diminishment of the primary poetic sentiment). Specifically, 'Rasa-doshas' are those defects that directly hinder the aesthetic relish. In the 'Dhvani' (suggestion) school of poetics, Rasa is always meant to be 'Suggested' (Vyangya), never 'Expressed' (Vachya). Stating the emotional elements directly by their names is considered a major defect.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
According to Mammata's 'Kavyaprakasha' (Ullasa 7), the following are considered major Rasa-doshas:
1. A. Rasasya svashabda-vachyatva (Rasasya svapadoktya): If a poet explicitly writes "I am feeling Shringara Rasa" or "This is Karuna Rasa," it is a defect. The Rasa must be suggested through descriptions of characters and their actions (Vibhavas, etc.).
2. B. Sthayinah svashabda-vachyatva (Sthayinah svapadoktya): The permanent dominant emotion (like Rati, Shoka, or Krodha) should not be named directly. Instead of saying "He felt love," the poet should describe the symptoms of love. Naming it directly kills the suggestion.
3. D. Vyabhicharinah svashabda-vachyatva (Vyabhicharinah svapadoktya): Similarly, transitory emotions (like Nirveda, Glani, or Shanka) should ideally be suggested. While sometimes naming them is permissible (Anitya-dosha), generally naming them by their own words (Svapadokti) is listed as a defect.
4. C and E: Gunas (Excellences) and Alamkaras (Figures of speech) are not emotional entities that are 'suggested' in the same way. Their naming is not a 'Rasa-dosha' in this theoretical framework.
Therefore, A, B, and D are the recognized Rasa-doshas in this context.
Step 4: Final Answer:
Stating the Rasa, Sthayi, or Vyabhichari Bhava by name is a technical defect in the theory of Suggestion. Thus, Option (C) is correct.