Question

Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Actually, Paran is a special playing repertoire of the Pakhawaj.
Reason (R): The word Paran is considered to have originated from the word Parna.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:

• A. Both (A) and (R) are correct and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
• B. Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
• C. (A) is correct but (R) is not correct
• D. (A) is not correct but (R) is correct

Hint:

When evaluating Assertion-Reason questions where both statements are true, ask yourself "Because" after the assertion. If the reason does not answer why that phenomenon physically occurs, select choice (2).

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Concept: A Paran is a powerful, grand composition type characterized by heavy, open drum syllables (Bols) traditionally rooted in temple dance accompaniment, mathematical calculations, and royal court presentations.

Step 1: Evaluate Assertion (A).
Assertion (A) states that the Paran is a specialized performance composition belonging to the Pakhawaj repertoire. The Pakhawaj features full-palm strikes (Khula Baaj) that create heavy, booming vibrations. Compositions that incorporate powerful syllables like Dhage, Dhana, Kradha, and Gadi-Gana are classified as Parans, which form a core element of the Pakhawaj performance tradition. Therefore, Assertion (A) is correct.

Step 2: Evaluate Reason (R) and link the logic.
Reason (R) points out that the word Paran historically evolved from the Sanskrit word Parna (which means a leaf or feather, implying branching aesthetic structures). This etymological derivation is factually true according to historic textual research. However, the linguistic origin of the word does not explain why the composition belongs to the Pakhawaj playing style (which is due to the drum's acoustic resonance and physical design). Because both statements are independently true but lack a direct causal relationship, choice (2) is correct.