Concept:
• Capital punishment (Death Penalty) is the ultimate deterrent in traditional penology.
• Modern criminologists and human rights activists argue against its efficacy and ethics.
• Thorsten Sellin was a prominent sociologist who conducted extensive research on the deterrent effect of the death penalty.
Step 1: Evaluate Assertion A
Thorsten Sellin's research in the 1950s and 60s showed that there was no significant difference in homicide rates between states with and without the death penalty.
He famously argued that it failed both as a deterrent (social protection) and as a balanced form of justice.
Assertion A is correct.
Step 2: Evaluate Reason R
Reason R states that capital punishment has "reformist value."
This is logically impossible, as the Reformative Theory of punishment aims to change the criminal's mind and integrate them back into society.
Since execution kills the offender, it has zero reformative value.
Additionally, many studies (like Sellin's) dispute its "deterrent effect."
Reason R is incorrect.
Step 3: Conclusion
Since A is a true statement about a scholar's findings and R is a factually and logically incorrect claim about the nature of the death penalty, the correct choice is option (C).