
We check for 1983 to 1986 if any bank had \( \geq 20% \) each year:
Bank A: \[ \text{1983: } \frac{23}{120} = 19.17%,\quad \text{Not qualified} \] Bank B: \[ \text{1984: } \frac{18}{140} = 12.85%,\quad \text{Not qualified} \] Bank C: \[ \text{1986: } \frac{11}{203} = 5.42%,\quad \text{Not qualified} \] Hence, none of the banks meet the criterion.


| IPC crimes | SLL crimes | Other crimes | |
| Delhi | * | * | * |
| Goa | * | 4 | * |
| Haryana | 8 | 6 | * |
| Karnataka | 3 | 2 | * |
| Kerala | * | 9 | * |
| Maharashtra | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Puducherry | 13 | 29 | * |
| Tamil Nadu | 11 | 7 | * |
| Telangana | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| West Bengal | 17 | * | 16 |

| No. of Friends | No. of Acquaintances | No. of Strangers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amudha | 1 | 4 | |
| Bharatan | |||
| Chandran | 1 | ||
| Dhinesh | 2 | ||
| Ezhil | 1 | ||
| Fani | 1 | ||
| Gowtham | 3 | 2 |
The following additional facts are also known.
1. Amudha, Bharatan, and Chandran are mutual strangers.
2. Amudha, Dhinesh, and Fani are Ezil's friends.
3. Chandran and Gowtham are friends.
4. Every friend of Amudha is an acquaintance of Bharatan, and every acquaintance of Bharatan is a friend of Amudha.
5. Every friend of Bharatan is an acquaintance of Amudha, and every acquaintance of Amudha is a friend of Bharatan.
| Sellers | Sum of the cost price (in Rs.) of each pen and pencil | Cost price (in Rs.) of all pencils - Cost price (in Rs.) of all erasers | Sum of cost price (in Rs.) of all pens and erasers |
| Ram | 15 | 100 | 2100 |
| Mohan | 13 | 480 | 2050 |
| Lakhan | 27 | 600 | 3000 |
| Raghav | 19 | 300 | 3300 |
