Question:

Fill in the blank: 
257, 291, ______, 365, 405

Show Hint

When two consecutive gaps are visible, test if differences themselves form an arithmetic progression.
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • 313
  • 322
  • 327
  • 343
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Approach Solution - 1

We need to identify the missing number in the sequence: 257, 291, ______, 365, 405.

The best approach is to first determine the pattern or rule governing the sequence. Let's calculate the difference between consecutive terms where possible:

  • From 257 to 291: 291 - 257 = 34
  • From 365 to 405: 405 - 365 = 40

We hypothesize that the differences might increment by a constant value. The difference might form an arithmetic sequence. To test this, we calculate the difference increase from 34 to 40:

  • Increase from 34 to 40: 40 - 34 = 6

Therefore, we suspect the missing difference between 291 and the missing middle number could be 34 + 6 = 40.

Using this logic:

  • From 291 to the missing number: 291 + 36 = 327

Thus, the missing number that fits the sequence is 327, as the differences would become 34, 36, 38, and 40, showing a steady increment of 2 in the difference values.

Therefore, the correct answer is: 327

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Instead of tracking gaps between consecutive terms, notice that each number in this sequence is close to a perfect square. Checking against squares of consecutive integers starting at 16 quickly reveals the pattern: \(16^2 = 256\), and the first term is 257, just 1 more. \(17^2 = 289\), and the second term is 291, 2 more. \(19^2 = 361\), and the fourth term is 365, 4 more. \(20^2 = 400\), and the fifth term is 405, 5 more. So each term equals \((15+k)^2 + k\), where \(k\) is the position of the term in the sequence (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).

For the missing third term, \(k = 3\), so the value should be \(18^2 + 3 = 324 + 3 = 327\).

  1. 313: This does not equal \(18^2 + 3\); it is 14 short of the value the pattern predicts, so it breaks the square-plus-position rule.
  2. 322: This is 5 short of \(18^2 + 3 = 327\), and does not fit the consistent offset pattern of \(+1, +2, +3, +4, +5\) seen in the rest of the sequence.
  3. 327: This equals \(18^2 + 3 = 324 + 3\), exactly continuing the offset pattern of \(+1, +2, +3, +4, +5\) that all the other terms follow.
  4. 343: This overshoots the predicted value by 16 and does not correspond to any nearby perfect square plus a small offset, so it breaks the pattern.

Since every other term in the sequence equals a perfect square (16 squared through 20 squared) plus its position number, the missing term must equal 18 squared plus 3, which is 327.

Therefore, the correct answer is 327.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -3

Since the sequence looks like it could follow a quadratic rule rather than a simple linear one, we can model each term as \( T_k = Ak^2 + Bk + C \), where \(k\) is the term's position (1 for 257, 2 for the missing term, 4 for 365, and 5 for 405), and solve for the constants \(A\), \(B\), and \(C\) using the terms we already know.

Using position 1: \(A + B + C = 257\). Using position 4: \(16A + 4B + C = 365\). Using position 5: \(25A + 5B + C = 405\). Subtracting the first equation from the equation at position 4 gives \(15A + 3B = 108\), and subtracting the equation at position 4 from the equation at position 5 gives \(9A + B = 40\). Solving these two together, from the second, \(B = 40 - 9A\), substituting into the first, \(15A + 3(40 - 9A) = 108\), which simplifies to \(15A + 120 - 27A = 108\), so \(-12A = -12\), giving \(A = 1\). Then \(B = 40 - 9 = 31\), and from the first original equation, \(C = 257 - 1 - 31 = 225\).

So the rule is \( T_k = k^2 + 31k + 225 \). Checking it against position 2 for the second term (already known to be 291): \(4 + 62 + 225 = 291\), which matches, confirming the formula is correct. The missing term is at position 3: \(T_3 = 9 + 93 + 225 = 327\).

  1. 313: Substituting into \(T_k = k^2 + 31k + 225\) at \(k=3\) gives 327, not 313, so this value does not satisfy the quadratic rule fitted from the other four terms.
  2. 322: This is 5 short of the value the formula predicts for position 3, so it does not solve the equation \(k^2+31k+225=327\).
  3. 327: This exactly matches \(T_3 = 9 + 93 + 225 = 327\), confirming the quadratic model fitted from the other four terms.
  4. 343: This overshoots the formula's prediction by 16 and does not fit \(T_k = k^2+31k+225\) at \(k=3\).

Solving the quadratic model built from the four known terms confirms the missing term is 327.

Therefore, the correct answer is 327.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top CLAT Logical Reasoning Questions

View More Questions

Top CLAT Questions

View More Questions