Concept:
Buddhist epistemology (Pramāṇavāda), especially as developed by
Diṅnāga and Dharmakīrti, accepts only two valid means of knowledge
(Pramāṇa) — Pratyakṣa (Perception) and Anumāna
(Inference). This system is based on the doctrine that there are only two
types of knowable objects (Prameyas):
• Svalakṣaṇa — Particulars or unique momentary realities.
• Sāmānyalakṣaṇa — Universals or conceptual constructions.
Step 1:
Understanding Statement A.
Statement A says that Buddhism accepts two Pramāṇas based on two kinds of
knowables (Prameyas).
This is absolutely correct.
According to Buddhist logicians:
• Pratyakṣa apprehends Svalakṣaṇa.
• Anumāna apprehends Sāmānyalakṣaṇa.
Thus, the division of objects directly determines the division of valid
knowledge.
Hence, Statement A is correct.
Step 2:
Understanding Statement B.
Statement B mentions:
• Svalakṣaṇa
• Sāmānyalakṣaṇa
These are indeed the two fundamental categories accepted in Buddhist
epistemology.
• Svalakṣaṇa refers to the ultimately real, momentary,
indivisible particular.
• Sāmānyalakṣaṇa refers to conceptual universals produced by
mental construction.
The entire Buddhist theory of knowledge revolves around these two divisions.
Therefore, Statement B is also correct.
Step 3:
Why Statement C is incorrect.
Statement C says Buddhism accepts four Pramāṇas beginning with
Pratyakṣa.
This is incorrect.
The four-pramāṇa system belongs mainly to the Nyāya school:
• Pratyakṣa
• Anumāna
• Upamāna
• Śabda
Buddhist philosophers reject independent status for Upamāna and Śabda.
They reduce them to inference.
Hence, Statement C is false.
Step 4:
Why Statement D is incorrect.
Statement D says Buddhism accepts Śabda as an independent
Pramāṇa.
This is false.
Buddhist logicians argue that verbal testimony operates through conceptual
construction and inference. Therefore, it is not independent.
Thus:
\[
\text{Śabda} \subset \text{Anumāna}
\]
Hence, Statement D is incorrect.
Step 5:
Why Statement E is incorrect.
Statement E mentions Pramāṇa Samplava.
Pramāṇa Samplava means that one object may be known through
multiple Pramāṇas.
This is accepted by Nyāya philosophers.
Buddhists reject this and instead accept
Pramāṇa Vyavasthā, meaning strict division of domains:
• Perception knows particulars.
• Inference knows universals.
Therefore, Statement E is incorrect.
Step 6:
Final Conclusion.
Only Statements A and B correctly describe Buddhist epistemology.
Therefore, the correct answer is:
\[
\boxed{(2)\ \text{A and B only}}
\]