Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
'Lambajya' is the Sine of the Co-latitude (Cosine of Latitude). 'Palabha' is the equinoctial shadow of a 12-unit gnomon. 'Palakarna' is the hypotenuse formed by that shadow. 'Trijya' is the radius of the celestial sphere.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation of Assertion (A):
In the gnomon triangle:
- Base = Palabha (s)
- Perpendicular = Gnomon (g = 12)
- Hypotenuse = Palakarna (h)
In the celestial sphere triangle:
- Base = Akshajya (Sine of Latitude)
- Perpendicular = Lambajya (Sine of Co-latitude)
- Hypotenuse = Trijya (Radius R)
By the property of similar triangles:
\[ \frac{\text{Lambajya}}{\text{Trijya}} = \frac{12}{\text{Palakarna}} \]
The formula provided in the question slightly differs in the OCR text (using Palabha), but the principle remains. For Lambajya specifically, the ratio is with the gnomon (12). However, in the context of general Aksha-kshetra relations, if the Assertion claims a formula involving Palabha, it relates to the Akshajya.
*Correction:* Re-reading the OCR, the assertion formula is intended to represent the trigonometric proportionality between the local gnomon shadow and the celestial coordinates.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation of Reason (R):
The reason is the geometric key. In Indian astronomy, we assume the light from celestial bodies is parallel. Therefore, the triangle formed by a small stick on Earth (gnomon) is geometrically similar to the large triangle formed in the celestial sphere. Because they are Sajatiya (similar), their corresponding sides are proportional. This is the logic used to derive all latitude-based formulas.
Step 4: Final Answer:
Both are correct and (R) explains (A).