Question:

Assertion (A): An ex parte decree may be set aside if the defendant satisfies the court that he was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing when the suit was called for hearing. Reason (R): Under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the court must be satisfied that the summons was not duly served or that the defendant was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing when the suit was called for hearing.

Show Hint

For ex parte decrees, immediately think of: Order IX Rule 13 = Non-service of summons + Sufficient Cause These are the two classic examination keywords.
Updated On: Jun 8, 2026
  • Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
  • Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
  • (A) is false, but (R) is true.
  • (A) is true, but (R) is false.
Show Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Concept: The Code of Civil Procedure seeks to ensure that no party suffers because of a lack of opportunity to present its case. Therefore, when a decree is passed in the absence of a defendant, the law provides a remedy through Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

Step 1: Meaning of an Ex Parte Decree.
* An ex parte decree is a decree passed against a defendant who failed to appear before the court despite the suit being called for hearing. * Such a decree is valid unless set aside according to law.

Step 2: Grounds for setting aside.
Order IX Rule 13 provides two major grounds:

• Summons was not duly served; or

• Defendant was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing.
Examples of sufficient cause include:

• Serious illness,

• Accident,

• Circumstances beyond the defendant's control,

• Other bona fide reasons accepted by the court.

Step 3: Relationship between Assertion and Reason.
* Assertion (A) correctly states one of the statutory grounds. * Reason (R) reproduces the legal requirement contained in Order IX Rule 13. * Therefore, the Reason directly explains why the Assertion is legally correct.

Order IX Rule 13 embodies the principle of natural justice by ensuring that no party is condemned unheard.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0