Question:
A was heading towards his office and while he was parking his car in the parking lot, A mistakenly hit another car which was already parked. Even after taking all necessary precautions, the accident occurred. Which concept of law covers this incident?
A was heading towards his office and while he was parking his car in the parking lot, A mistakenly hit another car which was already parked. Even after taking all necessary precautions, the accident occurred. Which concept of law covers this incident?
Show Hint
For legal concept questions:
\begin{itemize}
\item Identify whether reasonable care was taken,
\item Check if the incident could have been avoided,
\item Distinguish between negligence and inevitable accident clearly.
\end{itemize}
Updated On: Dec 19, 2025
Show Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in damage or injury to another person or property.
Step 2: An inevitable accident is an incident that occurs despite taking all reasonable care and precautions and could not have been avoided.
Step 3: In the given situation, A hit another car accidentally while parking, even after taking necessary precautions.
Step 4: Hence, the incident can be analyzed under the concepts of negligence and inevitable accident.
Step 2: An inevitable accident is an incident that occurs despite taking all reasonable care and precautions and could not have been avoided.
Step 3: In the given situation, A hit another car accidentally while parking, even after taking necessary precautions.
Step 4: Hence, the incident can be analyzed under the concepts of negligence and inevitable accident.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top SLAT Legal Studies Questions
- A abuses B, by which B is provoked. Because of this provocation, B takes out a gun and shoots at A. The bullet hits C, who is out of sight but is standing near A. C dies. Here, B did not intend or know that the bullet would hit C. B has committed
- Priya promises Shivi that she will obtain a public employment for Shivi and in return Shivi agrees to pay INR 10,000 to Priya. The contract is
- Principle: An accident physically unavoidable is a good defence under the law of torts.
Facts: Unexpectedly, a biker crossed in front of a bus on a road that was muddy because of the recent downpour. The bus skidded on the road as the driver applied the brakes to stop it from hitting the bicycle. As a result, the front of the plaintiff’s bus, which was approaching from the other way, was struck by the rear of the bus. It was discovered that both buses were being driven at moderate speeds. The accident nonetheless happened despite the driver’s best efforts.
Choose the correct derivation.
- Principle 1: Indian Constitution provides for freedom of speech and expression to all of its citizens.
Principle 2: The freedom is subject to reasonable restrictions like public order, etc.
Fact: At the time of the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution, which denounced Jammu and Kashmir’s statehood, the Central Government restricted Internet services in the region mentioned in its order. In certain regions, it reduced the speed from 4G to 2G. These orders were passed by the Central Government from time to time in light of the rumoured being spread about civilian encounter killings to prevent any untoward law and order situation from happening in the region and to quell the spread of fake news.
Choose the correct option.
- Principle: No man should be put in peril twice for the same offence.
Fact: Atul was driving his truck in an inebriated condition, which rammed into a cab killing the driver and the passenger. Atul fled from the scene and was arrested after absconding for a few months. He was prosecuted but for the lack of evidence acquitted. A year later, an eyewitness mustered courage and came forward to the police. The State sought to prosecute Atul again.
Choose the correct derivation.
View More Questions
Top SLAT Law of Torts Questions
- Principle: An accident physically unavoidable is a good defence under the law of torts.
Facts: Unexpectedly, a biker crossed in front of a bus on a road that was muddy because of the recent downpour. The bus skidded on the road as the driver applied the brakes to stop it from hitting the bicycle. As a result, the front of the plaintiff’s bus, which was approaching from the other way, was struck by the rear of the bus. It was discovered that both buses were being driven at moderate speeds. The accident nonetheless happened despite the driver’s best efforts.
Choose the correct derivation.
- Assertion: Mr. N speaks ill of the business which Mr. O is doing; it amounts to defamation.
Reason: Slander is actionable per se.
- A company XYZ Ltd. has been accused of violating the Environment Protection Act, 1986 by causing pollution in the local river. According to the principle of Strict Liability, what is the company's liability in this case?
- What is the meaning of the legal term ``Res ipsa loquitur''?
Top SLAT Questions
- Which of the following is an odd one out?
- Sangeet takes a right turn and moves for 5 km. He then turns left and walks for 15 km. He now takes a right turn and walks for 20 km. He again takes a right turn and walks for 15 km. He ultimately takes a right turn and walks for 10 km and stops. Where is he in comparison with his starting point?
- Identify strong/weak arguments. Should government impose a ban on liquor?
Argument 1: No, taxes on liquor are good source of revenue to government.
Argument 2: Yes, consumption of liquor leads to crime and cases of drunken driving.
- Which of the following words CANNOT be created with the letters of the word MEASUREMENT?
- Fill the blank so that the second pair of words exhibits the same relationship as the first pair.
Numismatist : Coins :: Arctophilist : ______
View More Questions