Question

Identify strong/weak arguments. Should government impose a ban on liquor?
Argument 1: No, taxes on liquor are good source of revenue to government.
Argument 2: Yes, consumption of liquor leads to crime and cases of drunken driving.

• A. only Argument 1 is strong
• B. only Argument 2 is strong
• C. both arguments are weak
• D. both arguments are strong

Hint:

In strong–weak argument questions, strong arguments are those that are directly related to the issue and supported by practical reasoning or real-life impact.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is D

Step 1: Understand the question.
The question asks us to evaluate whether the given arguments related to imposing a ban on liquor are strong or weak. A strong argument is one that is logical, relevant, and directly related to the issue.
Step 2: Analyze Argument 1.
Argument 1 states that liquor taxes are a good source of revenue for the government. This is a practical and realistic point because liquor sales contribute significantly to government income, which is used for public welfare and development. Hence, this argument is relevant and logical.
Step 3: Analyze Argument 2.
Argument 2 highlights that liquor consumption leads to crimes and incidents of drunken driving. This argument is also strong because it focuses on social harm, public safety, and law-and-order issues, which are valid reasons to consider banning liquor.
Step 4: Conclusion.
Both arguments present valid, logical, and relevant points from different perspectives—economic and social. Therefore, both arguments are strong.